First, I would like to thank all of my readers for following my blog, commenting, and what not. It’s nice to see that my posts have inspired the posts of other bloggers. I just wanted to let my readers know that I will be cutting the posting from twice weekly to once weekly. I am pretty busy with work but also with other self-improvement projects I have in the works for 2015. I am planning on taking up boxing, learning Spanish, and salsa dancing. So that will be quite a load in addition to writing, reading, traveling, and weight lifting like I am currently doing. I just wanted to let you guys know ahead of time in case you were wondering where Thursday’s post was going to be.
Now enjoy this rant against feminism.
Recently, in the world of pop culture, Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting, of TV show The Big Bang Theory, proclaimed that she is not a feminist. Naturally, such a public statement of blasphemy sent the shrilling harpy masses into a conniption fit. Luckily, the Cathedral was able to shame her into issuing a public apology. Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting is a fairly attractive woman. She is not a feminist because she has no need for it.
Beautiful women have no need for feminism. Regardless of the lack of female representation (compared to men) in positions of authority, women have always had a substantial amount of power in society. Women use coercion and persuasion over men as a means to get things done. This is the anatomy of female power. Women have always avoided positions of authority because with being in a position of authority comes responsibility and accountability. Women have a strong aversion to responsibility and accountability. You see this in even the most mundane social interactions like, “where should we go for dinner?” A woman will have greater respect for a man who makes a bad decision but is decisive than they will towards a man who makes no decision at all.
The current brand of feminism is made up of greedy women seeking more power than they already have, the tomboys (women who secretly want to be men), and the female equivalents of the basement-dwelling WoWmega males. The selfish women just want more power than they already have. The tomboys want to be men. The omega females are the fat, ugly types who are unable to exert influence over men because they are fat and ugly (and usually their personalities are congruent with their appearances).
This idea that we live in a patriarchy is obviously preposterous. If we lived in a true patriarchy, do we honestly believe that women’s suffrage would have happened? How did women’s suffrage come to be if there were virtually no women in Congress or the White House to pass it into law? It is because they exercised indirect power over men. In a true patriarchy, the alpha males of society would have collectively pimp-slapped the suffragettes and told them to get back in the kitchen.
Beautiful and charming women are very dangerous creatures because they have the ability to exercise an immense amount of power by using men as proxies. These women have no need for feminism. They can extract all of the resources from men that they need and create environments to ensure their safety and security using their natural talents of coercion and persuasion. Ugly/fat women cannot. That is why feminism is full of the most broken women you can find. Rarely do you see a gorgeous feminist. However, they do exist. When you do see a gorgeous feminist, you can make the assumption that she is psychology broken and/or power hungry (wielding power indirectly is not enough; she wants the positions of authority as well as the current amount of power that she already has). So men, when you meet a woman and she proclaims that she is a true, red-blooded feminist, what she is really proclaiming to you is that she is a failure as a woman. So approach with caution.
The post was inspired by this post from T. Bone over at The Rawness.