Rethinking 1776

Mrs. Powell: “Well, Doctor, what have we, a republic or a monarchy?”
Dr. Benjamin Franklin: “A Republic, ma’am, if you can keep it.”

Time has proven, Dr. Franklin, that we cannot keep our republic. The American Right will find it difficult to consider the unthinkable: that perhaps the Founding Fathers were wrong. This seems paradoxical until we consider the element of time, and how philosophies naturally grow over that duration. The Enlightenment ideals espoused by our Founding Fathers formed the foundation of American conservatism since the beginning. Even today, if we were to reset our society back to the government our Founders gave us, most of us on the reactionary Right would be pretty happy with that situation. That society had it all: Limited government, a landed aristocracy to establish hierarchy, minimal suffrage, low taxes, hard money, federalism, and liberty! There’s much to like and little to dislike.

Enter time. Where would the United States be in another quarter millennia after the reset? Since one thing followed another last time, a similar development would occur. That would return us back to where we are at the present time, a progressive nihilistic disaster run by lumbering, debt-ridden, bureaucratic managerial state. With the Enlightenment philosophies as the backing for that early form of America, it would once again follow the path of whittling away at the intricate structure set up by the Founders. How are we to deny the vote to anyone, if all men are equal? How are we to avoid allowing the courts and legislature chip away at our social infrastructure with progressive ideals that themselves are descended from the same Enlightenment dogma? History would repeat itself.

And so we might ask, what is the point? That a few generations may enjoy the republic just to have their posterity suffer once again under progressive democratic socialism? We on the Right desire law, order, and hierarchy. Another sign of a true reactionary — and all conservatives, as those who desire reality over the inexorable human desire for greater importance to the individual and its desires, are reactionaries — is the desire for stable governance. Gentle reader, has the United States ever been a stable country since its founding? On the contrary, it has been an sequence record of conflict and government expansion. Thus, why reset to this point in time? Why not go back further? The biggest reason is that 1776 is all that we on the American Right really know. The idea of a monarchy is truly foreign to us.

During the Founding, one man in particular favored a monarchist-style government. That man was Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton proposed the idea of an elective-monarch who operated in the confines of a constitution. His idea was rejected. If Hamilton had his way, it probably would not have mattered anyway. The constitutional monarchies that exist today are often worse off in terms of the “progress” they have made than we are. Most of them have evolved into socialist democracies with universal suffrage. The monarchs in many of those countries are merely figureheads. The personal lives of the English Royal Family has become as equally vapid as the celebrity worship found in Us Weekly or People magazine. If we are to have a monarchy, it must be one without suffrage. Americans will have to get over their monarchophobia. We have seen how the mob behaves. Do we really want to put them back in the driver seat?

This leaves us in an unsteady position. With the knowledge of the past, we must craft the future. And yet, where the past was error, we must throw out those ideas and replace them with others. The question is then one of quality or degree. How far back do we go, and what do we borrow from the distant past? We are like astronauts on a new world, looking at guidebooks of history and attempting to adjust what we find there to work for our new — or renewed — colony.

It is clear that the United States Government (USG) will collapse. This will be broader than a Great Depression style collapse, most likely a full on dissolution of the USG and the Union itself. Once this happens, the nation will Balkanize into new nation-states, and we must begin reforming something that resembles civilization. This much is inevitable, given the decay seen already. As we go into the lead-up to this downfall, we on the Right must ask ourselves: is it the Republic we wish to restore, or something far earlier?

Originally posted at Amerika

This entry was posted in Reactionary and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Rethinking 1776

  1. Wrath says:

    Europeans used to worry that they would be made to live in a EU similar to that of the Federal USA, but now I wonder, will the future of the US look more like the present day EU?


  2. OSclad says:

    Here are two ideas to fix the monarchic system:
    1) The monarch practices polygamy so that there are hundreds or thousands of possible successors from which to choose
    2) The monarch hand-picks his successor from among non-family members, as the 5 Good Emperors of Rome did
    3) The spouse of the monarch is hand-picked by someone other than the monarch (even his mother might work) so that the relationship is purely contractual rather than based on love.

    Or maybe some combination of 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 might be interesting.


    • Those are some very interesting suggestions that I can honestly say I never considered. Hereditary monarchy is a concern because the king may not have a son or the son may be way too young to take the crown. Having multiple wives & children would surely alleviate that problem.


    • Polagamy presents risks of spreading through society. It might be better to have one wife and many concubines. This might lessen the potential harm to traditional marriage and strengthen marriage alliances.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Very valid point. Polygamy would be bad for society. It would leave lots of men disaffected in the society feeling alienated. Men who feel they dont share a place in a society often resort to unhealthy and radical behavior i.e. see young Islamists.


    • Wrath says:

      These days hereditary problems are likely to be alleviated with modern technology (IVF, surrogacy, even cloning!), and there is always the old Norse style of Monarchy: elected Kings (by a council of elders or whathaveyou).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s